Daniel Hilst
a64dfe149a
A node that has finished installing has chain.currstate "boot", and from
that point the server must stop naming it a boot file: a node given a
netboot script every time it powers on reinstalls itself forever, and does
so silently, because each individual boot looks like a successful one.
Neither backend did that. The wire suite found both.
ISC gated the whole boot-from-disk branch on $doiscsi, so the rule only
fired for a node with an iscsi table row. An ordinary installed node fell
through to the netboot branches below and its xNBA second stage was handed
its own install script. Both the xnba and the pxe branch had it; the pxe
one handed out pxelinux.0.
Kea reads "boot-file-name": "" as *unspecified*, not as "no boot file", so
the empty boot file on the node's reservation did not outrank the classes
every client shares. The always-evaluated xcat-bios class supplied
xcat/xnba.kpxe, the loader came back announcing user class xNBA, and the
per-network class then supplied the network's boot script -- so withholding
only the per-node script withheld nothing. The fix is the same mechanism the
DROP and NOIP classes already use: a xcat-localboot class holding the MACs,
and a "not member('xcat-localboot')" guard on every class that names a boot
file. Kea requires a class to be defined before it is referenced, so
xcat-localboot is written first.
iSCSI is the exception on both backends. Its root disk is on the network and
gPXE is what attaches it, so it still gets a loader: ISC keeps its $doiscsi
branch, and Kea leaves those MACs out of the class.
spec.md S-31 is rewritten to say what correct is -- no boot file at all, on
either request of an xNBA boot, whatever the netboot method -- rather than
the weaker "not its own script", which the second stage above shows is not
the same statement.
conf/localboot.conf asserts the stronger form and gains a netboot=pxe node,
since that branch is written separately and the xnba node passing says
nothing about it. dhcpfixture.sh defines it.
An assertion with != or not-in now holds against a target that is absent
from the reply: a reply naming no boot file has certainly not named the
node's install script. Every other operator still fails on absence, and
"absent" remains the way to assert absence itself.
xCAT-test/unit
Unit tests. These run against the source tree only -- no xCAT installation, no running daemons, no management node.
They are executed on every pull request by the xcat_test GitHub Actions workflow,
which calls run_unit_tests() in github_action_xcat_test.pl:
prove -r xCAT-test/unit
You can run exactly the same thing from a clean checkout:
cd <xcat-core checkout>
prove -r xCAT-test/unit
What belongs here
A test belongs in unit/ when everything it needs is in the checkout: plugin and
library sources, kickstart/preseed/subiquity templates, postscripts, packaging
metadata. Such a test asserts on rendered output or module logic and reaches the
repository root through FindBin:
use FindBin;
use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../../perl-xCAT";
use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../../xCAT-server/lib/perl";
Because of those FindBin paths the tests only work from a source tree. The copy
installed under /opt/xcat/share/xcat/tools/autotest/unit is not a substitute --
../.. resolves to /opt/xcat/share/xcat/tools there and the tests die or silently
skip. The CI takes a copy of the checkout before the build for this reason; see
preserve_source_tree().
What does not belong here
Anything that needs an installed xCAT, a populated /install, a real service binary
or a live daemon. Those go in ../integration and run on
a management node through xcattest. Both suites run on every pull request -- the
workflow installs xCAT on the runner and then runs the ci_test cases against it --
so putting a test in integration/ does not cost it CI coverage. What differs is what
each suite is allowed to depend on, and that unit tests also run standalone from a
bare checkout with no xCAT at all.
Shell-script unit tests belong in ../bats
and run with BATS. Do not add Perl .t tests that grep shell source when the
behavior can be exercised by sourcing a shell library or script and shadowing the
external commands it calls.
The distinction matters because a test that needs an absent environment does not fail
-- it calls plan skip_all and reports as skipped. A handful of those in a suite of
several hundred assertions is easy to stop reading. Keeping the two kinds in separate
directories means a skip in unit/ is a real signal rather than routine noise.
Guarding on a source file, on the other hand, is fine and common here:
plan skip_all => "compute.subiquity.tmpl not found" unless -f $tmpl_path;
That guard never fires when the tree is intact.