Daniel Hilst
70a114e2c8
An assertion resolved its target through Reply.field, which collapses a list to its first item. A name with two A records could therefore never satisfy `data == <the second one>`, and _equal's list branch -- written for exactly that case -- was unreachable. Reply.whole returns the container intact and assertions use it. References keep the old behaviour: $step.data substitutes one value into a command line, so the first is the right answer there.
xCAT-test
Unit tests that run from the source checkout are split by implementation language:
| Test type | Location | Runner |
|---|---|---|
| Perl unit tests | xCAT-test/unit/*.t |
prove -r xCAT-test/unit |
| Shell unit tests | xCAT-test/bats/*.bats |
bats -r xCAT-test/bats |
| DHCP wire tests | xCAT-test/dhcptest/ |
python3 -m unittest discover -s tests, then dhcptest run -i <nic> <conf> |
| CLI functional tests | xCAT-test/autotest/testcase/ and xCAT-test/autotest/bundle/ |
xcattest -f <cluster.conf> -t <case> or xcattest -f <cluster.conf> -b <bundle> |
Use Perl .t tests for Perl modules, Perl scripts, templates, and repository
artifacts. Use BATS tests for shell-script behavior that can be exercised from
the checkout by sourcing a shell library or script and shadowing external
commands.
Shell behavior should not be tested by Perl tests that grep shell source. Put
those tests under xCAT-test/bats instead.
dhcptest is the odd one out: its Python unit tests and dhcptest validate
run offline like the others, but its point is the third column -- driving real
DHCP transactions on a provisioning NIC and asserting on what came back. It
talks to the server only over the wire, so it is agnostic to which DHCP
implementation is answering and to xCAT itself.
See unit/README.md, bats/README.md and dhcptest/README.md for the
detailed rules for each suite.