mirror of
https://github.com/xcat2/confluent.git
synced 2024-11-22 09:32:21 +00:00
Workaround ':' format specifier syntax
Older python will break by assuming that : always means a format expression is coming. Move the field value fetch to format_field, and ascertain if some of the expression was shunted to format specification by mistake.
This commit is contained in:
parent
dc0183fdf4
commit
32081edec8
@ -1011,8 +1011,17 @@ class _ExpressionFormat(string.Formatter):
|
||||
self._numbers = None
|
||||
|
||||
def get_field(self, field_name, args, kwargs):
|
||||
return field_name, field_name
|
||||
|
||||
def format_field(self, val, format_spec):
|
||||
if ']' in format_spec:
|
||||
field_name = val + ':' + format_spec
|
||||
format_spec = ''
|
||||
else:
|
||||
field_name = val
|
||||
parsed = ast.parse(field_name)
|
||||
return self._handle_ast_node(parsed.body[0].value), field_name
|
||||
val = self._handle_ast_node(parsed.body[0].value)
|
||||
return format(val, format_spec)
|
||||
|
||||
def _handle_ast_node(self, node):
|
||||
if isinstance(node, ast.Num):
|
||||
@ -1061,8 +1070,6 @@ class _ExpressionFormat(string.Formatter):
|
||||
op = self._supported_ops[optype]
|
||||
return op(int(self._handle_ast_node(node.left)),
|
||||
int(self._handle_ast_node(node.right)))
|
||||
elif isinstance(node, ast.Constant):
|
||||
return node.value
|
||||
elif isinstance(node, ast.Index):
|
||||
return self._handle_ast_node(node.value)
|
||||
elif isinstance(node, ast.UnaryOp):
|
||||
@ -1087,6 +1094,8 @@ class _ExpressionFormat(string.Formatter):
|
||||
else:
|
||||
index = self._handle_ast_node(node.slice)
|
||||
return strval[index]
|
||||
elif isinstance(node, ast.Constant):
|
||||
return node.value
|
||||
else:
|
||||
raise ValueError("Unrecognized expression syntax")
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user